UK time is: 07:14:41
Vital Login
Social Login

Choose your club

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's Football, It's Vital'

Jordan blasts Blues 'fake' AJ bid

In a bizarre (and somewhat amusing) turn of events, Crystal Palace chairman has claimed Blues have never made a bid for striker Andrew Johnson, much to the confusion of absolutely everybody.

Despite David Sullivan claiming Blues had had a bid of 3 million plus two players turned down - a deal worth 6.5 million in total - Simon Jordan used his Observer column to claim that Blues have never spoken to anyone at Palace, and that a bid was never received.

Jordan wrote: 'Birmingham have not spoken to anyone senior at Palace, haven't made a bid, haven't made an inquiry. They haven't been told we'll sell him in the summer - they haven't been told anything.

Sullivan has misled the press, his fans and ours, all - I'm guessing - in a sad attempt to make Birmingham look ambitious.'

This statement was met by total bemusement by Blues spokesman Andy Maxey, who insisted Blues had made a bid:

'These comments by David Sullivan relate to an inquiry we made about Andrew Johnson four weeks ago,' he said. 'At that time Simon Jordan made it clear that Johnson wasn't for sale so we won't be making a bid.'

However, these comments only served to further infuriate Jordan, who angrily denied there had been any contact whatsoever:

'Absolute rubbish. They've never made an inquiry: it's nonsense.'

If there was no bid, as Jordan states, then it is bewildering why Sullivan declared we had one rejected in the first place.

However, bearing in mind Jordan's previous antics, the animosity between the two clubs, and my 'perfectly neutral' standpoint, the more likely explanation is that Jordan is trying to besmirch the name of the club by making false accusations.

Considering that the Press Association, who originally released the story, are sticking by it, and that Jordan has a history of using his column to attack anyone and everyone, it would be unsurprising if Palace had actually received a bid - especially considering our spokesman was able to detail exactly when it was sent.

The history between the two clubs relates to the transfer of Clinton Morrison in 2002. Jordan was unhappy with the way the transfer was conducted, and said at the time:

'They offered 5m for Clinton Morrison, which we rejected. Their interest in the player then appeared in the press, the player became unsettled and we ended up having no choice but to sell for a massively reduced fee of 3.5m.

It felt like a mugging. It made taking Johnson from them really sweet compensation.'

Jordan's comments make it all the more confusing as to why we sold Morrison back to Palace, especially as Norwich were also interested. If it turns out Blues actually did submit a bid, then a retraction from Jordan would be expected - but don't hold your breath.




Use your social login to comment on front page articles. Login using you Facebook, Twitter, Google or LinkedIn accounts and have your say!



Register on this site via the drop down menu and leave feedback to this story below or click here to join in the debates on the forum.

Go on, get vitalled!

The Journalist

Writer:  Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Sunday January 8 2006

Time: 7:13PM

 

Have Your Say

Log in...
with your social network     OR     with your Vital account

Recent Birmingham City Articles

Talking Point: Formations (Friday July 25 2014)

Kidderminster v Birmingham City (Friday July 25 2014)

Adeyemi Set for New Role (Friday July 25 2014)

Koran Rippers Banned (Friday July 25 2014)

Blog: StAn's Fans 24/07/14 (Thursday July 24 2014)

Hancox is Confident (Thursday July 24 2014)

Archived Birmingham City Articles

List All Vital Birmingham Articles
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll

Vital Members League (view all)

League Results (view all)

Latest Results

League Table (view table)

Team P W D L GD Pts
1. Birmingham 0 0 0 0 +0 0
2. Blackburn 0 0 0 0 +0 0
3. Blackpool 0 0 0 0 +0 0
4. Bolton 0 0 0 0 +0 0
5. Bournemouth 0 0 0 0 +0 0
6. Brentford 0 0 0 0 +0 0
7. Brighton 0 0 0 0 +0 0

Breaking League News

Kidderminster 0 - 3 Birmingham City
Birmingham : 27/07/2014 22:32:00
Owls share spoils in Rovers friendly
Sheff Wed : 27/07/2014 20:21:00
LUFC Leeds Summer Transfer Rumours - Week Eleven
Leeds Utd : 27/07/2014 19:13:00
The Championship 2014/15 - Brentford
Reading : 27/07/2014 18:23:00
Latics Put On Open Training Session For Fans
Wigan : 27/07/2014 17:42:00

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

Do Birmingham need another striker?
Suggested By:  
Yes 92%
No 5%
Undecided 3%