UK time is: 10:56:47
Vital Login
Social Login

Choose your club

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's Football, It's Vital'

Jordan blasts Blues 'fake' AJ bid

In a bizarre (and somewhat amusing) turn of events, Crystal Palace chairman has claimed Blues have never made a bid for striker Andrew Johnson, much to the confusion of absolutely everybody.

Despite David Sullivan claiming Blues had had a bid of 3 million plus two players turned down - a deal worth 6.5 million in total - Simon Jordan used his Observer column to claim that Blues have never spoken to anyone at Palace, and that a bid was never received.

Jordan wrote: 'Birmingham have not spoken to anyone senior at Palace, haven't made a bid, haven't made an inquiry. They haven't been told we'll sell him in the summer - they haven't been told anything.

Sullivan has misled the press, his fans and ours, all - I'm guessing - in a sad attempt to make Birmingham look ambitious.'

This statement was met by total bemusement by Blues spokesman Andy Maxey, who insisted Blues had made a bid:

'These comments by David Sullivan relate to an inquiry we made about Andrew Johnson four weeks ago,' he said. 'At that time Simon Jordan made it clear that Johnson wasn't for sale so we won't be making a bid.'

However, these comments only served to further infuriate Jordan, who angrily denied there had been any contact whatsoever:

'Absolute rubbish. They've never made an inquiry: it's nonsense.'

If there was no bid, as Jordan states, then it is bewildering why Sullivan declared we had one rejected in the first place.

However, bearing in mind Jordan's previous antics, the animosity between the two clubs, and my 'perfectly neutral' standpoint, the more likely explanation is that Jordan is trying to besmirch the name of the club by making false accusations.

Considering that the Press Association, who originally released the story, are sticking by it, and that Jordan has a history of using his column to attack anyone and everyone, it would be unsurprising if Palace had actually received a bid - especially considering our spokesman was able to detail exactly when it was sent.

The history between the two clubs relates to the transfer of Clinton Morrison in 2002. Jordan was unhappy with the way the transfer was conducted, and said at the time:

'They offered 5m for Clinton Morrison, which we rejected. Their interest in the player then appeared in the press, the player became unsettled and we ended up having no choice but to sell for a massively reduced fee of 3.5m.

It felt like a mugging. It made taking Johnson from them really sweet compensation.'

Jordan's comments make it all the more confusing as to why we sold Morrison back to Palace, especially as Norwich were also interested. If it turns out Blues actually did submit a bid, then a retraction from Jordan would be expected - but don't hold your breath.




Use your social login to comment on front page articles. Login using you Facebook, Twitter, Google or LinkedIn accounts and have your say!



Register on this site via the drop down menu and leave feedback to this story below or click here to join in the debates on the forum.

Go on, get vitalled!

The Journalist

Writer:  Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Sunday January 8 2006

Time: 7:13PM

 

Have Your Say

Log in...
with your social network     OR     with your Vital account

Recent Birmingham City Articles

Former Striker Joins Exeter City (Friday November 28 2014)

Watch: Francis v QPR (Friday November 28 2014)

Johnstone Joins Macclesfield (Friday November 28 2014)

Rowett Credits Lee Clark (Friday November 28 2014)

An Evening with Gary Rowett (Thursday November 27 2014)

Birmingham Trying to Recruit Today (Thursday November 27 2014)

Vote: Birmingham Take on Forest (Thursday November 27 2014)

Trueman Joins Leamington On Loan (Wednesday November 26 2014)

Archived Birmingham City Articles

List All Vital Birmingham Articles
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll

Vital Members League (view all)

League Results (view all)

League Table (view table)

Team P W D L GD Pts
16. Leeds Utd 18 5 5 8 -5 20
17. Fulham 18 5 4 9 -5 19
18. Millwall 18 4 7 7 -5 19
19. Birmingham 18 4 7 7 -14 19
20. Brighton 18 3 9 6 -3 18
21. Rotherham 18 4 6 8 -10 18
22. Wigan 18 3 8 7 -4 17

Breaking League News

12th Man - Rousing Support Lifts Everyone
Wigan : 28/11/2014 10:43:00
Did Toney fail Wolves medicial?
Wolves : 28/11/2014 10:02:00
The Opposition View - Norwich
Reading : 28/11/2014 10:00:00
The Reading Point Of View
Norwich : 28/11/2014 10:00:00
RUFC - Bowery 'We Need Goals'
Rotherham : 28/11/2014 09:57:00

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

Birmingham v Nottingham Forest
Suggested By:  
Home win 24%
Draw 20%
Away win 56%