Vital Football

Latest Birmingham City News

Jordan blasts Blues 'fake' AJ bid

Jordan blasts Blues 'fake' AJ bid

In a bizarre (and somewhat amusing) turn of events, Crystal Palace chairman has claimed Blues have never made a bid for striker Andrew Johnson, much to the confusion of absolutely everybody.

Despite David Sullivan claiming Blues had had a bid of £3 million plus two players turned down - a deal worth £6.5 million in total - Simon Jordan used his Observer column to claim that Blues have never spoken to anyone at Palace, and that a bid was never received.

Jordan wrote: 'Birmingham have not spoken to anyone senior at Palace, haven't made a bid, haven't made an inquiry. They haven't been told we'll sell him in the summer - they haven't been told anything.

Sullivan has misled the press, his fans and ours, all - I'm guessing - in a sad attempt to make Birmingham look ambitious.'

This statement was met by total bemusement by Blues spokesman Andy Maxey, who insisted Blues had made a bid:

'These comments by David Sullivan relate to an inquiry we made about Andrew Johnson four weeks ago,' he said. 'At that time Simon Jordan made it clear that Johnson wasn't for sale so we won't be making a bid.'

However, these comments only served to further infuriate Jordan, who angrily denied there had been any contact whatsoever:

'Absolute rubbish. They've never made an inquiry: it's nonsense.'

If there was no bid, as Jordan states, then it is bewildering why Sullivan declared we had one rejected in the first place.

However, bearing in mind Jordan's previous antics, the animosity between the two clubs, and my 'perfectly neutral' standpoint, the more likely explanation is that Jordan is trying to besmirch the name of the club by making false accusations.

Considering that the Press Association, who originally released the story, are sticking by it, and that Jordan has a history of using his column to attack anyone and everyone, it would be unsurprising if Palace had actually received a bid - especially considering our spokesman was able to detail exactly when it was sent.

The history between the two clubs relates to the transfer of Clinton Morrison in 2002. Jordan was unhappy with the way the transfer was conducted, and said at the time:

'They offered £5m for Clinton Morrison, which we rejected. Their interest in the player then appeared in the press, the player became unsettled and we ended up having no choice but to sell for a massively reduced fee of £3.5m.

It felt like a mugging. It made taking Johnson from them really sweet compensation.'

Jordan's comments make it all the more confusing as to why we sold Morrison back to Palace, especially as Norwich were also interested. If it turns out Blues actually did submit a bid, then a retraction from Jordan would be expected - but don't hold your breath.



Register on this site via the drop down menu and leave feedback to this story below or click here to join in the debates on the forum.

Go on, get vitalled!

Writer:
Date:Sunday January 8 2006
Time: 7:13PM

Login to post a comment

Best of Vital Network

Recent Birmingham City Articles

Could this Bundesliga striker answer Blues' problems?

Tom Heslop takes a look abroad as Birmingham City begin their hunt for a new goal scorer

This Everton youngster should be looked at by Harry Redknapp

Tom Heslop takes a look at one Everton player who has a very bright future

New EFL Radio Deal Starts 2017/18

The Football League confirmed yesterday that a new three year deal with Talksport and the BBC had been signed to increase radio broadcast coverage from next season.

Harry Redknapp setting the bench mark

Harry Redknapp is building the depths of the squad

Archived Vital Birmingham Articles

Vital Birmingham articles from

Site Journalists

Tom Heslop
Editor email
Profile
Christopher Handy
no email
Profile
Saskia Bowes
no email
Profile
Rob Wildey
no email
Profile
Luke Turner
no email
Profile

Current Poll (see more polls)

Should Blues appoint Harry Redknapp permanently?
Suggested By: Vital Blues staff
Yes92%
No8%
ScoopDragon Publishing Entire League Network of Sites

League Table

# Team P W D L Pts. GD
C Newcastle 46 29 7 10 94 45
P Brighton 46 28 9 9 93 34
3 Reading 46 26 7 13 85 4
4 Sheff Wed 46 24 9 13 81 15
5 Huddersfield 46 25 6 15 81 -2
6 Fulham 46 22 14 10 80 28
7 Leeds Utd 46 22 9 15 75 14
8 Norwich 46 20 10 16 70 16
9 Derby County 46 18 13 15 67 4
10 Brentford 46 18 10 18 64 10
11 Preston 46 16 14 16 62 1
12 Cardiff 46 17 11 18 62 -1
13 Aston Villa 46 16 14 16 62 -1
14 Barnsley 46 15 13 18 58 -3
15 Wolves 46 16 10 20 58 -4
16 Ipswich 46 13 16 17 55 -10
17 Bristol City 46 15 9 22 54 -6
18 Q.P.R. 46 15 8 23 53 -14
19 Birmingham 46 13 14 19 53 -19
20 Burton 46 13 13 20 52 -14
21 Forest 46 14 9 23 51 -10
R Blackburn 46 12 15 19 51 -12
R Wigan 46 10 12 24 42 -17
R Rotherham 46 5 8 33 23 -58
Vital Football Comment
Latest F1 News
Latest Vital Boxing News
Write for Vital Football

Recent Birmingham City Results (view all)

Birmingham City Fixtures (view all)

Vital Members League Table

RankNamePoints
1.Brooklyn46
2.WayCoolBlue41
3.David Village32
4.gazal12
5.cropped11
6.Rob Wildey110
7.Sausage n egg8
8.WhoRya2
9.Chrisblues2
10.Stevendp1
The Vital Football Members League